Thursday, February 17, 2011

Prompter v Court Reporter

I was thinking about what other skill I could develop that might be a natural outgrowth of prompting.  Court reporter?  They both require rapid writing and razor-keen listening.  I even went out and bought my own steno machine to kind of get a look & feel of the thing...

But then I keep thinking about Dragon Naturally dictate. There are basically two reasons why Dragon doesn't overcome human transcribers:  1) lag time 2) differentiating people in the room.  It's not quite "there" yet.  So stenographers are still needed in the courtroom.

But really doing legal stuff all day, listening to courtroom procedure, and listening to lawyers talk all day... is that what I want?

What I'm really good at is writing the way people talk.  I've listened to probably more newscasts than most people except anchor people, directors and producers of news.  (Reporters generally don't listen to/watch the newscast in my experience).

I also write like the wind.  So I'm thinking about trying to branch into the "creative" side of corporate speech writing.  Believe me, they need me.  It's all-too-easy to skate around the edges and not really deliver satisfying words while hitting all the PR points/Brand Messaging.  I did prompter at an event the other week and thought about the role of the speech coach, and the writer, and I thought, "why am I behind this prompter?"


Two things that will never go away: prompters, and people's need to express themselves deeply, clearly and creatively, and people that facilitate both. 

I can do both.  At the same time!  And bill for one position!  Wonder if anyone will take me up on it?


actual steno machine $30 eBay purchase

Wednesday, February 16, 2011

Novel Teleprompter Application: Acting Audition & Demo Reels

Interrotron was a development in prompting that allowed documentary subjects to look directly into the camera while talking to someone.  

Basically it's a teleprompter setup, but instead of the graphics output, it carries a video output so the subject looking at the camera, can look at someone in front of the camera and talk to them directly.

So I'm thinking about acting and I'm thinking about this inexpensive laptop based solution. 

(I spoke with the manufacturer - the product image shows a laptop with a 180 degree hinge, but it'll work with a MacBook, which does not open to 180-degrees.)

(Learn your lines: It's not about being off book by using a prompter -- it's about giving yourself something to work off of, an image, directly in front of the camera.  You could actually look into another (projected) person's eyes and talk to them.

Technology is making it more and more possible for people to record their own video demos and email them to a casting director.

Since the beginning of acting actors have had to deal with their environment, from talking to their audience, to having a 4th wall, to cameras, to sets falling down, to trucks backfiring, clanking dinner plates, to cellphones (unless you're Hugh Jackman).

In any case, here's a what if:

Actors can put up an image of someone on their computer like an interrotron (see above) - using this inexpensive setup.  They can either project an image of someone like they'd be talking to, or actually edit an acting friend's performance into the scene as they do theirs, looking directly into the actor's image.

So if your demo uses a side, and let's say you're reading against a hard-boiled cop, you could put up any number of acting images in your Interrotron setup.  Or better, either you or a friend could act the other role, and play it on the laptop while the beam-spitting glass puts the actor's image up, while recording your role through the camera.  You have someone to act against.

Will this give you a competitive edge?

I think it works well as a concept, but I don't know anyone who's actually doing it.  If you're getting a lot of auditions like this, it might make sense to do this setup.

It's likely better, and cheaper, to use and hone your chops by doing a substitution or just working on place or music, but if that isn't coming strongly to you, or you're new/uncomfortable with it, and you gotta get something goin' on, this may be an option.

But in any case, on a set, no director is going to set up an interrotron just for the actor to get comfortable with a camera in their face.

Maybe a waste of money and effort? Maybe not?

Ultimately it's probably better for the actor to get cool with their skills under any/all conditions and deal with it - almost every set I've ever been on has a lot of things which are working against the actor, and it's the good ones that integrate the total reality (without trying to control everything to death) into their performance.

That said this may be a bad idea, perhaps even a disservice, but it may also be useful.

I can see how a producer would jump on this kind of setup in order to get a better performance out of a wooden actor who is paying them $500 - $2000 for a great reel-- but whether it will work is anyone's guess at this point, I guess.

What do you think?  Have you or anyone you know tried this?

I can easily actors with iPods/iPads doing this with their equipment using the new iPad/iPod/iTouch Prompters because Macs make it so easy to cope with video.

On Personal Resume Videos - a few notes for beginning video resume producers

Graphical elements aside, there are a few basic components I would consider for any job-seeker's setup - your mileage may vary depending on your experience and aptitude.

1) An excellent microphone.  Blue Yeti Pro is probably the best all-purpose mic and can be boom/shock/desk mounted.  If you don't need the dual xlr /usb inputs, the Blue Mic is also good.  Excellent audio quality promotes intimacy, and the Blue Yeti comes with a variety of patterns to cope with your particular recording situation.  No matter what the mic, be sure to listen objectively to the sound coming out of the computer's built-in mic, then try watching the video with your computer's external speaker monitors, then on your smartphone: does the audio hold up across these platforms?  Troubleshoot and boost/tone down what's needed.  Generally consider:

a. room tone
b. background noises like electricity, refrigerators
c. outside noises
d. device noises
e. chair/desk/floor noises

You may be able to "roll off" audio problems by using hi-pass/low-pass filters and other effects in your audio program.

2) Consideration of lighting.  While it's not necessary to go out and get a panel, consider throwing as much light as you can on the subject without blowing him/her out or creating harsh shadows

3) Background.  Some cheap to free video programs now even do digitized overlay backgrounds.  If you don't have a decent-looking backdrop, corporate other otherwise, use a virtual one, but just make sure there's enough light around your head and edges so that the keyed image doesn't bleed into the subject.  (A stronger light line can separate the two)

4)  From the same angle, consider doing one close take, one medium take, and one wide take, and cut between the three to emphasize important aspects to your employer

5)  Using a prompter.  There is a good, inexpensive glass solution for your laptop and handheld camera:

Laptop-and-Glass Solution from TelePrompterMirrors.com - click here

Take a look at the hinge and make sure it can accommodate the 180-degree bend required.  A Mac might put an odd angle  and not be able to fit under the camera.  I've contacted the manufacturer to see whether a Mac Book would work or not.  Will update this post when they get back to me.

That said if you're using the built in camera, try finding free or browser based prompting software like this one...

http://www.easyprompter.com/

6) If you're using the built in camera -- one in the frame of your lap top's CD -- then try to move as far back as possible or connect to the camera as if it were not just some person like your mom, so you feel comfortable, but imagine the representative of the company you want to apply to.  If you're not getting a strong enough idea or image, print a big corporate logo and tape it to the wall right above the camera and sit there and think about what the company stands for before you speak.

Eye travel reads no matter how discretely you're trying to avoid appearing like you're reading on a teleprompter.  So just try to stay natural.  That said, it's almost impossible.

6a) Keep a little nervous energy - it doesn't show up as badly as you think, and a little inner tension, if you roll with it, makes for good viewing.  Try to move it around as you talk about yourself, the company, and roll with your plan for speaking.  It's engaging to hear someone going through an issue, rather than listening to the uniform drone of someone who "has it all figured out".

Don't have a drink or smoke anything before going "on air", unless that's what you're doing as your "normal" thing and do your "normal" thing, no more or less. (WP has no opinion on this issue other than addressing performance issues around it.)  The person watching it likely hasn't had a drink or smoke and isn't on the exact same vibration as you.  Just try practicing until you're less nervous is all.


7) Walk around a little in between takes.  If you're doing prompting for the first time, people gather tension as they read, blow it, and try again.  Try to stay loose.  Listen to some music that puts you on the right "vibe" for the presentation, then turn it off and start talking.  It can give a person a nice, open quality if they're unused to public speaking.

8) Consider your video a project that can alienate people as easily as a typo on a resume.  No one cares if you did it yourself, just like your resume.  Unless you're a sharp editor, and can manage good audio and good video, hire a good crew for 1/2 day.  Tell them to shoot plenty of B-roll of things that support showing you in your best light - your awesome library, your tools in your garage, really well-rendered graphics of your work, working in the field, or doing things that support the idea of yourself that you're putting across.  No matter how good you are at your job, if you have odd shadows, strange echoes and audio, and an inappropriate setting, you could be sending the wrong message.

9) If you have a nice photo of yourself and are mainly focusing on visual presentation, consider just doing a PowerPoint and using a nice photograph of yourself with a sweet, intimate audio of you speaking, possibly with an audio track as well.  You can time these out perfectly in PowerPoint, Keynote, or Garage Band.

9) Distribution: Use Vimeo right now for distribution.  It reaches more devices.

10) Solicit feedback from friends... or not.  They might have specific feedback if they know a/v and presentation issues, or they might not know what they don't like about it, but might have generally negative or positive comments.  Try a/b'ing a few elements against each other and see which one gets a "Bingo!" and which one gets a "eh" from people.  Whatever they say back to you, your answer is "Thank you".  If you're not in a personal space to be open to feedback or critique, don't do it, and just try to research other people's videos to see what you like and don't like about theirs and see what you can do with yours along those lines.

Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Recommendation: Kevin Newman, CBC Global National, ABC News

"Its about feeling safe on the high-wire of live television. And Ian has that rare ability to sense when you're about to take a risk, when you're staying safe, and when to throw out the rescue rope."

Thanks, Kevin!

Being supportive of anchors is the best part of the job.  Those magic production-side moments when everyone, from producer on down to prompter, are in the same breath, making a newscast that is capable of changing with change on a moment's notice.  Best part of the job.

Friday, February 11, 2011

Reviews / Recommendations

https://docs.google.com/present/view?id=dc847r96_0g72ppsfb&autoStart=true

So far Bob and Barry came in since yesterday ... still waiting for a good 1/2 dozen more...

Twitter / Facebook

Amazing reviews coming in...

Thanks Bob Young and Barry Mitchell for your great reviews, which I will publish soon.  I have other outstanding recommendations coming in... stay tuned...

Monday, February 7, 2011

Guide to Prompter Workflow

Working on it... up in about a week.  Any tips?  Leave comments here!


Thursday, February 3, 2011

Work Journal: a day in the field

Client is a major pharmaceutical company gearing up for a big conference.  I brought two teleprompter machines - a MacBook-based system and a Windows Vista machine, both with several software packages installed.

MiniDisplay Port to VGA connector: Check.  The Windows laptop has VGA-out built in.

Every creative person in the conference room had a MacBook Pro.  There must have been six.  And the live show, which includes slides, speeches, a live show, and more.  When I asked them about prompting on the MacBook (a newer one) they said the graphics were way smoother as compared to their experience with PC based solutions (although I'm sure even a 10-year-old graphics card should be able to handle the work).  Taking a look at the output, I totally agreed.  I was generating graphics out to four huge monitors with zero problems and it was smooth as silk.

Getting used to up/down keys, though, instead of a scroller, was different... you push up to scroll up, and down to both slow down (or configure however you want) and eventually reverse the flow.  This became a little confusing, as sometimes you wind up doing too much input and there's lag time between pressing the button and getting the result you want as the prompter goes through its process.

This precipitated two gaffes with the talent ("Can we go back just a few lines?  Eh.... just a few..." as the script copy flew by) but the situation came under control as I got used to my hardware.

Probably the easiest part, though, was having a show producer who was wholly unafraid to take as many phone calls as it took to make sure I talked with everyone from IT to the writer as I sketched my mental model together of the workflow.  MP, you rock.  KL, and JAM were also great to work with preparing the script.  P. gave total reassurance of the IT flow and made sure there was a DisplayPort to VGA connection (I got one last night at the Apple Store just for my kit bag, but it's always nice to arrive knowing they've worked on a Mac before). 

Second easiest part?  Plugging into the corporate internet and OSX finding all the printers near me immediately and being able to print updates for the writer with zero IT/IS issues to contend with.

Good luck to Celgene at their conference.

 


What stories was I on shift for?

  • OJ Simpson - 20/20 - the car chase
  • Storming of the White House in Russia - the people stuck on the bridge
  • Princess Diana
  • Democratic National Convention at Madison Square Garden (Bill Clinton's 1st Nomination) for WABC-TV
By 9/11/01, I was writing at News 12 Long Island and News 12 Connecticut, where I eventually was evening & weekend producer.

I'll write more as they come to memory...

Wednesday, February 2, 2011

Dude, Don't Bogart My Script...Scroll Your Own!



(Conflict of interest indicator on this opinion: 10 out of 10!  I'm a prompter operator for hire!) 

The iPad-iPhone-iPod Prompting System from ProPrompt sniffs other Apple devices and wirelessly unifies the prompting effort, so that various iPods/iPhones/iPads can act as controllers and slaves for a wireless prompter solution.  I haven't tried it or seen it in person but it seems worth talking about.

Both iPads and iPhones act as either/both the LCD under the semi-reflective glass, and the prompter character generator.  One unit is under the camera, and the other (optionally) is in-hand acting as a remote control.

Part of their solution is software based - a license for iPads, iPhones, and iTouch is $9.99.

They also have a version that pushes scripts to reporters in war zones exlusively.

The hardware price points vary.  For example they offer an iPad bracket and mount that on your stand, but the talent won't be looking directly into the camera.  They also offer a range of TelePrompTer style rigs based on Apple products, as well as their one rig that works on DSLR's up to ENG/Studio cameras.

TECHNIQUE POINT
What you may or may not know about shooting, is that film works at the level of registering how someone is thinking about something.  The camera-subject relationship aligns the audience with events and people.  So if someone is supposed to be looking either at a) someone else or b) you-the-camera, and that's off by even the slightest degree, I-as-audience, feel that person is disconnected from my "reality" as defined by the camera.  So the decision to move the script off the camera lens is extremely crucial, and one that shouldn't be taken lightly.

Basically the cost of the prompter is worth the cost of the project because it's a critical point of failure - have you ever spoken to someone who can't look at you?  or have you seen someone not looking a the person they were supposed to be talking to even a little bit?  I know!  They look crazy, right?

My two cents:  The talent should be doing nothing other than reading the prompter.  The should not be scrolling it, which demands a kind of distracted attention of their presence that cannot-but-register on camera, no matter how talented they are.  Their entire presence should be focused on connecting to people with the material running through them.  Always try to have a separate operator who is skilled enough to keep the relationship between the talent and the material seamless.

Obviously, the one or two-man band that newsrooms frequently deploy obviate this.  I'm just trying to illustrate a goal and some points.  Your mileage may vary.

Of course the most optimal is no prompter, but that's not always optimal when there are legal implications of what is being said.

(Conflict of interest indicator on this opinion: 10!  I'm a prompter operator for hire! But I believe in this logic 100% as I am also a classically trained actor, and have also worked in newsrooms.  While the neural stress may make the person onscreen more engaging, it's not really the right kind of tension that develops trust -- it just makes the talent look medicated, in a bad way.)

NEWSROOM/REPORTER APPLICATION
This apparently makes it easy for reporters to "scroll their own" in the field and in the studio.  From live updates, to stories that fall through, to demanding weather conditions, they have a lot to cope with while trying to look like they marched straight out of Brooks Brothers or Nordstrom's, as the world turns around them.

It also allows producers and associate producers to push scripts to repoters (via email) to update their stories in the field.

Those who worked during 9/11 remember the long hours of talking about the same thing over and over again with no end in sight and no new information except for a rushed words just before air from their producer.  As we seem to be living in an era of increased possiblities of 9/11's, climate change disasters, and the manipulation of commodities prices that is precipitating revolutions that demand 24/7 coverage, this seems like an excellent way to push volumes of timely copy to reporters on a relatively inexpensive setup.

What's the value?  Basically it's how much gripping air time you can generate by keeping your talent on-air longer with cutting edge truth waiting to be spoken.  How many commercials can you weave in around live updates that are geniunely useful and new? 

With this the talent can be hands-free (which frees up their musculature to appear more relaxed and natural), rather than do the look into the camera - look into the iPad - look into the camera - look into the iPad thing.

There are some costs though: do you really want reporters to be virtually paperless? Paper may not be the most reproduceable media any more, but it certainly seems to be extremely durable compared to LCD displays powered by batteries.

LIVE/STUDIO/DOCUMENTARY/FILM/SITCOM/WEBISODE APPLICATION

In a secure location it seems very useful.  A key concern will be the daylight visibility of the i-series devices, and syncing updates with the writer/producer so that changes can be made rapidly. 

I'm going to be scheduling an interview with ProPrompter to discuss various (newsroom, sitcom, film, hosting demo, field) applications, advantages, limitations, cost/benefit, ease of use and  integration into newsroom environments, and any other issues.

Do you have any questions?  Email a text or MP3 of your question, and I'll be happy to pose them during the interview.  I'll use your first-name only and not disclose your email on-air or blog.

Have you tried the software or the hardware? In what environment?  How did it work?  Comments are welcomed.

World Prompter Website

My website is up! It has the commercial, the contact form, and a nice surprise - I found an autographed picture of Peter Jennings that he signed to my Dad when he visited the set of TV-3 at ABC.