Great new reviews & all my contact info:
http://www.productionhub.com/directory/edit/index.aspx?item=199102
Tuesday, May 31, 2011
New Partner! Atlantic TV
World Prompter is proud to announce our strategic alliance (eh, freelancing partnership) with Atlantic TV, and P., who is just about the nicest person one could ever have a cold-call with.
Thanks Atlantic! Here's to a bright and prosperous future together!
Thanks Atlantic! Here's to a bright and prosperous future together!
Thanks, Benjamin Moore!
Just wanted to say thanks to everyone on the Benjamin Moore shoot - great fun!
Monday, May 23, 2011
Review from Estee Lauder Shoot
Ramin Fathie, Viceroy Films:
"Ian always handles our Teleprompter needs efficiently and accurately. In corporate settings, his calm and professional demeanor puts nervous executives at ease, helping to create results that are surprisingly natural. He is an asset on any production."
"Ian always handles our Teleprompter needs efficiently and accurately. In corporate settings, his calm and professional demeanor puts nervous executives at ease, helping to create results that are surprisingly natural. He is an asset on any production."
Thursday, May 19, 2011
Prompters In Action
These prompters are outside of the WNET Public Channel building in New York City, just a block down from Julliard. Note the Autoscript logo:
Labels:
autocue,
new york city prompter operator,
new york city teleprompter,
prompter,
Teleprompter Services
More Notes on Working with the Autocue SS17
In terms of overall build quality it's a prompter whose lines give confidence.
However: there are these little silver things that sit in the rails that posts stand on - I've mentioned these posts in prior postings.
Those little silver things have little tongues that press them up into the roof of their groove so they don't fall out. OTOH in normal use, those little tongues are somewhat fragile and break: then the silver thing falls out of the machine.
Also: As I had mentioned in other posts, Autocue doesn't include an additional screw for the camera if the camera plate is mounted and the riser plate is used: that means you need two screws - one to screw the prompter rails into the camera plate on the sticks, and another to screw the camera actual onto the riser plate.
Be sure as a prompter operator to bring an extra set. I was lucky on one shoot to have a cameraman with an extra screw, and another with mechanic sense to find a regular metal screw that would fit, that bolstered the difference with nuts and washers.
Going to B&H to get the rest of the parts.
ALSO: If you're buying a case for it, the Pelican 1660 is a monster-widowmaker case. While the Pelican 1650 case seems ideal, I haven't proven you can cut the foam and set the prompter in there as of yet, in addition to the monitor.
Both Pelican cases are outstanding in their own right but the 1660 is really very, very large.
However: there are these little silver things that sit in the rails that posts stand on - I've mentioned these posts in prior postings.
Those little silver things have little tongues that press them up into the roof of their groove so they don't fall out. OTOH in normal use, those little tongues are somewhat fragile and break: then the silver thing falls out of the machine.
Also: As I had mentioned in other posts, Autocue doesn't include an additional screw for the camera if the camera plate is mounted and the riser plate is used: that means you need two screws - one to screw the prompter rails into the camera plate on the sticks, and another to screw the camera actual onto the riser plate.
Be sure as a prompter operator to bring an extra set. I was lucky on one shoot to have a cameraman with an extra screw, and another with mechanic sense to find a regular metal screw that would fit, that bolstered the difference with nuts and washers.
Going to B&H to get the rest of the parts.
ALSO: If you're buying a case for it, the Pelican 1660 is a monster-widowmaker case. While the Pelican 1650 case seems ideal, I haven't proven you can cut the foam and set the prompter in there as of yet, in addition to the monitor.
Both Pelican cases are outstanding in their own right but the 1660 is really very, very large.
Monday, May 9, 2011
Beamsplitter
Here's a neat trick of the beamsplitter glass of prompters.
In this image, the beamsplitter appears as a mirror. But if you were to look at this beamsplitter on-location, it would appear transparent.
This is from the Benjamin Moore How to Paint industrial shoot in Ridgewood, New Jersey. See how in the reflection of the glass, you can see the floorboards? It's picking up the reflection of the 17-inch monitor mounted underneath, facing the ceiling with reversed text. (Which I fuzzed out in the photo.)
In the room, you're looking through the glass to the camera lens.
In this image, the beamsplitter appears as a mirror. But if you were to look at this beamsplitter on-location, it would appear transparent.
This is from the Benjamin Moore How to Paint industrial shoot in Ridgewood, New Jersey. See how in the reflection of the glass, you can see the floorboards? It's picking up the reflection of the 17-inch monitor mounted underneath, facing the ceiling with reversed text. (Which I fuzzed out in the photo.)
In the room, you're looking through the glass to the camera lens.
Sunday, May 8, 2011
Lessons Learned on the Autocue SS17
I recently broke out an Autocue SS17 at an industrial shoot in Ridgewood, New Jersey.
The SS17 is plate-based.
Here's something you need to know about setting up your Autocue SS17.
It arrives pre-assembled: It takes just a few minutes to whip it out of its flat box and onto the sticks when you are familiar with it.
However, it's easy to run into this problem: the camera operator had mentioned several times that the prompter felt wobbly on the sticks.
Not a good sign. What was the problem?
Here's one problem that caused that situation:
The SS 17 comes with a series of posts, 1- and 2-lengths long, that screw into each other, to form 1, 2, or 3 post high platform riser for a camera with a longer lens that extends closer to the beamsplitter (the teleprompter glass).
In order to screw the lengths in, you firstly have to screw the male part into the female part -- that makes the post stand up.
At this point, you can't screw them in all the way, because of the following procedure: you need to place the plate over the posts and reposition the posts underneath the holes in the plate to get the correct alignment. Then you place screws in from the top to fasten the plate to the posts.
Got it? The posts are screwed in loosely to find the position under the plate. Then the screws go in to secure the relative positioning of all of it, together.
Problem is, you have to then go back under the plate, and finish screwing in the posts to their "fixed" position. Then finish screwing in the screws.
The operator was mentioning, rightly, that the posts were loose. But I thought I'd tightened the screws when I mounted the plate.
The user error was in not going back around after positioning all the parts and fastening it all together tightly. In order to get to the part of tightening the top screws, the bottoms might be loose at that point.
BOTTOM LINE: Make sure you go around the rig and tighten everything up, screws and posts alike, bottom and top, because initial setup requires doing the whole thing loosely first, then tightening all around again, bottom, then top.
ALSO:
The posts that are 1- and 2-lengths long: They're hard to unscrew bare- or glove-handed. Good luck, though, is that one of the sections has a hole big enough through the diameter that you can fit a screwdriver through it, and the torque from the screw driver instantly unlocks the screws. With bare hands, though, because the steel is plated and very smooth, and very hard to unscrew.
Also: There's only one screw that mounts to the camera plate. The camera plate we used had about a dozen screw holes of several widths in different positions.
An operator should carry two screws for the camera mount to the plate, so that there's more than just one possible point of failure. The steel just isn't "grippy", so all that steel-on-steel action, with the constant movement of the operator on the camera arm, winds up loosening the screw. Operators have a lot of faith in that one little screw, but because there's only one point of contact, the camera tends to rotate around the axis that's been formed, sliding around the pivot and needing readjustment. The prompter operator should carry a few extra screws to mount the plate to the camera shoe.
Your operator will admire your concern for their well-being.
The SS17 is plate-based.
Here's something you need to know about setting up your Autocue SS17.
It arrives pre-assembled: It takes just a few minutes to whip it out of its flat box and onto the sticks when you are familiar with it.
However, it's easy to run into this problem: the camera operator had mentioned several times that the prompter felt wobbly on the sticks.
Not a good sign. What was the problem?
Here's one problem that caused that situation:
The SS 17 comes with a series of posts, 1- and 2-lengths long, that screw into each other, to form 1, 2, or 3 post high platform riser for a camera with a longer lens that extends closer to the beamsplitter (the teleprompter glass).
In order to screw the lengths in, you firstly have to screw the male part into the female part -- that makes the post stand up.
At this point, you can't screw them in all the way, because of the following procedure: you need to place the plate over the posts and reposition the posts underneath the holes in the plate to get the correct alignment. Then you place screws in from the top to fasten the plate to the posts.
Got it? The posts are screwed in loosely to find the position under the plate. Then the screws go in to secure the relative positioning of all of it, together.
Problem is, you have to then go back under the plate, and finish screwing in the posts to their "fixed" position. Then finish screwing in the screws.
The operator was mentioning, rightly, that the posts were loose. But I thought I'd tightened the screws when I mounted the plate.
The user error was in not going back around after positioning all the parts and fastening it all together tightly. In order to get to the part of tightening the top screws, the bottoms might be loose at that point.
BOTTOM LINE: Make sure you go around the rig and tighten everything up, screws and posts alike, bottom and top, because initial setup requires doing the whole thing loosely first, then tightening all around again, bottom, then top.
ALSO:
The posts that are 1- and 2-lengths long: They're hard to unscrew bare- or glove-handed. Good luck, though, is that one of the sections has a hole big enough through the diameter that you can fit a screwdriver through it, and the torque from the screw driver instantly unlocks the screws. With bare hands, though, because the steel is plated and very smooth, and very hard to unscrew.
Also: There's only one screw that mounts to the camera plate. The camera plate we used had about a dozen screw holes of several widths in different positions.
An operator should carry two screws for the camera mount to the plate, so that there's more than just one possible point of failure. The steel just isn't "grippy", so all that steel-on-steel action, with the constant movement of the operator on the camera arm, winds up loosening the screw. Operators have a lot of faith in that one little screw, but because there's only one point of contact, the camera tends to rotate around the axis that's been formed, sliding around the pivot and needing readjustment. The prompter operator should carry a few extra screws to mount the plate to the camera shoe.
Your operator will admire your concern for their well-being.
Labels:
autocue,
How to Avoid Prompter Fail,
New Jersey,
new york city,
new york city teleprompter,
ridgewood,
ss17,
Teleprompter fail
Location:
Ridgewood, NJ, USA
Saturday, March 12, 2011
How to Avoid Prompter Fail
World Prompter guy Ian McGrady thinks days like this should never happen:
Ian says:
My first job was at ABC News, World News Tonight. We were retyping the entire show starting about 2 hours before the show, cutting and pasting it practically as we ran upstairs.
Peter Jennings had a copy of the script at his desk. If the prompter failed due to wrong copy, or just plain eating the paper (it was basically turning the script into a conveyor belt beneath a camera) he was mindful of the copy and could seamlessly switch between his copy and the machine.
Although it makes talent nervous when the script disappears, "good" talent knows the script and the story in their mind: so if the prompter fails, they have a sense for thinking about what's going on, and can extravert their thoughts seamlessly.
Unfortunately the prompter falsely presents an illusion that people can talk freely especially when cameras are almost always zoomed in past the prompter.
Maybe as a function of truth in advertising cameras should always show when people are talking on prompters.
That aside, here's a good tip to avoid massive system failures like the one above:
1. Print the script.
2. Put in TURN PAGE blocks or markers that show where the physical script is printed
(the operator can provide the best marking - they should collaborate with the writer)
3. Producers should give talent time to rehearse while turning the pages and confirming the behavior for themselves until they're comfortable
4. Practice once with deliberate failure and switching so the talent feels comfortable in any circumstance, prompter or no
5. NOW you're ready to go live.
Ian says:
My first job was at ABC News, World News Tonight. We were retyping the entire show starting about 2 hours before the show, cutting and pasting it practically as we ran upstairs.
Peter Jennings had a copy of the script at his desk. If the prompter failed due to wrong copy, or just plain eating the paper (it was basically turning the script into a conveyor belt beneath a camera) he was mindful of the copy and could seamlessly switch between his copy and the machine.
Although it makes talent nervous when the script disappears, "good" talent knows the script and the story in their mind: so if the prompter fails, they have a sense for thinking about what's going on, and can extravert their thoughts seamlessly.
Unfortunately the prompter falsely presents an illusion that people can talk freely especially when cameras are almost always zoomed in past the prompter.
Maybe as a function of truth in advertising cameras should always show when people are talking on prompters.
That aside, here's a good tip to avoid massive system failures like the one above:
1. Print the script.
2. Put in TURN PAGE blocks or markers that show where the physical script is printed
(the operator can provide the best marking - they should collaborate with the writer)
3. Producers should give talent time to rehearse while turning the pages and confirming the behavior for themselves until they're comfortable
4. Practice once with deliberate failure and switching so the talent feels comfortable in any circumstance, prompter or no
5. NOW you're ready to go live.
Monday, March 7, 2011
Nearer, the End draws... kind of
As technology seeks to replace workers, here's an example...
http://www.autoscript.tv/voice-plus
Autoscript's Voice Plus says it obviates the prompter operator. I am wondering how deep the features set goes for skipping pages, resetting.
In a mildly slower envronment, like a single-camera one-man band corporate setup I can totally see it working.
In a network newsroom environment, though, especially during a breaking news event, people are basically yelling information during tosses to VT or correspondents; I don't see it working there. But it may have good applications in simpler environments.
http://www.autoscript.tv/voice-plus
Autoscript's Voice Plus says it obviates the prompter operator. I am wondering how deep the features set goes for skipping pages, resetting.
In a mildly slower envronment, like a single-camera one-man band corporate setup I can totally see it working.
In a network newsroom environment, though, especially during a breaking news event, people are basically yelling information during tosses to VT or correspondents; I don't see it working there. But it may have good applications in simpler environments.
Friday, February 25, 2011
Political Prompter Persecution Ploy Plotz: Steve Womack, Defunder of the People
The Arkansas Times' Max Brantley reports (from a reported acquaintance's blog) that U.S. Representative Steve Womack has dropped his pursuit of de-funding Obama's teleprompter, which is somehow eyeballed at $5 (m)illion dollars.
Representative Womack reportedly says he's dropping this campaign because he can't get an actual cost of the service and equipment, and in addition...
So until U.S. lawmakers are willing to really take the gloves off - in this case, the teleprompter - let's let fair be fair.
Representative Womack reportedly says he's dropping this campaign because he can't get an actual cost of the service and equipment, and in addition...
We're asking people to do more with less. And I think the president ought to lead by example. He is already a very gifted speaker and I think that's one platform he could do without. -- U.S. REPRESENTATIVE STEVE WOMACK
If you look at Obama speaking with or without the prompter, aesthetically it doesn't make much difference. He thinks in parentheticals, with lots of commas, like this sentence, and that isn't going to end, any time, soon, so you'll never really know just when those sentences, are going to end, even ones, like this.
Moreover, any time anyone is asking people to make do with less (which appears to be a current talking point) it seems prudent to keep the other eye open for who's going to be profiting from all this "making do with less". High food prices precipitated food-commodities bubbles, which precipitated the revolutions in the Mideast.
While World Prompter does not have an official opinion on hyper-monetizing commodities, revolutions, talking points, or political parties, we are glad that this bit of political grandstanding about Obama's teleprompter is over.
World Prompter loves communication, and is in favor of taking away all teleprompters from all politicians, to let politics drift back into the hands of talented orators who at least were capable of being lyrical and having a good memory. Imagine memory as a requisite for the practice of politics.
The British House of Commons offers many spirited examples of un-teleprompted political exchange:
World Prompter loves communication, and is in favor of taking away all teleprompters from all politicians, to let politics drift back into the hands of talented orators who at least were capable of being lyrical and having a good memory. Imagine memory as a requisite for the practice of politics.
The British House of Commons offers many spirited examples of un-teleprompted political exchange:
So until U.S. lawmakers are willing to really take the gloves off - in this case, the teleprompter - let's let fair be fair.
How to Spin a Prompter
The New York Observer's David Freedlander reports Biden taking the heat off of Obama's teleprompter.
Freedlander reports:
Vice President Joe Biden spoke at a $500 a head fundraiser for 250 big-wig Democratic donors today at the midtown Sheraton, hosted by east side Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, and made a few cracks...
[...]
Biden spoke mostly extemporaneously, and stopped midway through his speech and asked that the teleprompters flanking the podium come down.
"I am not using this thing. If you want to put it down, it's ok by me," he said. "You know Barack said, excuse me, the President said, 'Joe is learning to make a speech with a teleprompter and I am learning to do one without a teleprompter."'
Very clever and humble way to deal with the situation. Takes the heat off the legislation to defund the President's prompter, and makes light of Biden's loose-cannon nature.
Freedlander reports:
Vice President Joe Biden spoke at a $500 a head fundraiser for 250 big-wig Democratic donors today at the midtown Sheraton, hosted by east side Congresswoman Carolyn Maloney, and made a few cracks...
[...]
Biden spoke mostly extemporaneously, and stopped midway through his speech and asked that the teleprompters flanking the podium come down.
"I am not using this thing. If you want to put it down, it's ok by me," he said. "You know Barack said, excuse me, the President said, 'Joe is learning to make a speech with a teleprompter and I am learning to do one without a teleprompter."'
Very clever and humble way to deal with the situation. Takes the heat off the legislation to defund the President's prompter, and makes light of Biden's loose-cannon nature.
Wednesday, February 23, 2011
Novel Prompter Application - Update from TeleprompterMirrors
My earlier post mentioned an inexpensive setup for people who basically laptop-prompt, like maybe a simple video blog.
Here is a response I received from Veronica at Teleprompter Mirrors which speaks further to the issue:
Hello Ian,
Yes our product works great with Macs. We actually have a software specifically for a Mac as well. If the computer does not open all the way, you just have to find a way to elevate the quickprompt itself above the keyboard portion as to not get the keyboard in the film.
[That little block is located underneath the camera in this photo...]
There is a little DIY contraption you can build or using some books would suffice. You can find the DIY at this page:
http://www. telepromptermirrors.com/ teleprompterstand17.htm
Has anyone tried this? Send your photos and your story!
I can see someone making some serious change off of a really nice stained wood setup. If I were video blogging daily I would seriously consider it, or maybe like a nice Benjamin Moore color to warm it up even more.
Here is a response I received from Veronica at Teleprompter Mirrors which speaks further to the issue:
Hello Ian,
Yes our product works great with Macs. We actually have a software specifically for a Mac as well. If the computer does not open all the way, you just have to find a way to elevate the quickprompt itself above the keyboard portion as to not get the keyboard in the film.
[That little block is located underneath the camera in this photo...]
There is a little DIY contraption you can build or using some books would suffice. You can find the DIY at this page:
http://www.
Has anyone tried this? Send your photos and your story!
I can see someone making some serious change off of a really nice stained wood setup. If I were video blogging daily I would seriously consider it, or maybe like a nice Benjamin Moore color to warm it up even more.
Tuesday, February 22, 2011
Better is Better: Zen and the Art of Prompting
It seems like a basic skill set: put the file in the program, roll the prompter. Up, down, back, go back to here. But adding presence adds a lot.
The measure of a prompter operator, then, is in very small degrees of their attentiveness to their environment while rolling, as well as their presence in the room.
And the question shouldn't be do they just not do anything wrong, but do they actually contribute the correct zeitgeist in their presence? Does their presence, and those little moments of communication, really add something to the set, or the production floor?
Of course these are questions normally a hiring manager would answer... but you really have to consider what someone is bringing to the mix beyond the skill set.
Why is this important?
Because prompter part of the art of communication, and our world is rife with palatable and distasteful moments.
So not just the prompter operator's skill and acumen, but their disposition, should add something. They should be willing to lend supportive presence... not with a sense of "doing" something, but of allowing the best possible combination of production and talent events to conspire so that the talent, your point-person, can feel not just unencumbered by the machine and the operator, but supported in a kind of invisible, energetic way.
That's what you want - someone who really can bring that into the room. Even dumb stuff, like eating crackers quietly while someone's trying to read, can just add a really small negative to the room.
The measure of a prompter operator, then, is in very small degrees of their attentiveness to their environment while rolling, as well as their presence in the room.
And the question shouldn't be do they just not do anything wrong, but do they actually contribute the correct zeitgeist in their presence? Does their presence, and those little moments of communication, really add something to the set, or the production floor?
Of course these are questions normally a hiring manager would answer... but you really have to consider what someone is bringing to the mix beyond the skill set.
Why is this important?
Because prompter part of the art of communication, and our world is rife with palatable and distasteful moments.
So not just the prompter operator's skill and acumen, but their disposition, should add something. They should be willing to lend supportive presence... not with a sense of "doing" something, but of allowing the best possible combination of production and talent events to conspire so that the talent, your point-person, can feel not just unencumbered by the machine and the operator, but supported in a kind of invisible, energetic way.
That's what you want - someone who really can bring that into the room. Even dumb stuff, like eating crackers quietly while someone's trying to read, can just add a really small negative to the room.
Monday, February 21, 2011
The Politics of Defunding Obama's Prompter: World Prompter's Analysis
Waste. Of. Time.
This takes a committee of people to arrive at this now famous moment
http://www.losteyeball.com/index.php/2008/12/08/way-to-read-the-teleprompter/
You can't just blame the talent here. The producer has to see it's just in the end a thin line between one story and the next. The transitions have to be talent-proof. The way some writers write, they just write the story and that's necessary in an environment where a producer just wants to slide stories around like blocks.
But the newscast isn't just the story - it's the flow and transitions as any producer will tell you, and that's the lyrical part of the job.
If you're a producer, you have an obligation to study the talent and know what they're going to do with the text.
If you're talent, you have an obligation to try to not find a catch-all style that "works for everything" because obviously it doesn't. You can just click through channels and see who is "doing their style" and who has actually read and understood if not the entire story, the part that they're responsible for.
If you're the prompter, you have an obligation to indicate to the talent, very slightly, that a new story has come up but sliding the top of the next story to the top of the glass, and "imaging" (freezing) slightly - giving them a visual cue that a new story has come up.
Prompting effectively is very much about very close communication through the tools. Prompting isn't writing and it isn't reading - it's an idiom unto itself, and an operator has habits that they adjust for the talent.
Don't just look at this anchor and say, "what a dope". These things happen by committee and everyone is part of it. Even the prompter.
You can't just blame the talent here. The producer has to see it's just in the end a thin line between one story and the next. The transitions have to be talent-proof. The way some writers write, they just write the story and that's necessary in an environment where a producer just wants to slide stories around like blocks.
But the newscast isn't just the story - it's the flow and transitions as any producer will tell you, and that's the lyrical part of the job.
If you're a producer, you have an obligation to study the talent and know what they're going to do with the text.
If you're talent, you have an obligation to try to not find a catch-all style that "works for everything" because obviously it doesn't. You can just click through channels and see who is "doing their style" and who has actually read and understood if not the entire story, the part that they're responsible for.
If you're the prompter, you have an obligation to indicate to the talent, very slightly, that a new story has come up but sliding the top of the next story to the top of the glass, and "imaging" (freezing) slightly - giving them a visual cue that a new story has come up.
Prompting effectively is very much about very close communication through the tools. Prompting isn't writing and it isn't reading - it's an idiom unto itself, and an operator has habits that they adjust for the talent.
Don't just look at this anchor and say, "what a dope". These things happen by committee and everyone is part of it. Even the prompter.
Sunday, February 20, 2011
iPad as a threat to teleprompers: what do you think?
Here's an interesting thread - says a senior official was avoiding using prompters b/c of cost, but tried this iPad app.
On the one hand, it might be great to have the script scrolling on an iPad/iTouch setup especially for public speaking where looking at a podium is totally acceptable.
Sometimes, actors also need to have some dialogue placed for them, like if someone has to stand in - I can see this working really well. I was on a production recently that could have used an iPad setup, placed neatly say, behind a vase, with the talent reading off of it.
Of course paper is the best/cheapest medium and sometimes, if the actor isn't on-book, you can just stick the pages in the talent's hands. But you'd have to be careful that the actor isn't going to be self-conscious and trying to compensate for it.
Again - not ideal, but a possiblity.
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/open-dv-discussion/491768-cut-notes-timecode-notes-ipad.html
On the one hand, it might be great to have the script scrolling on an iPad/iTouch setup especially for public speaking where looking at a podium is totally acceptable.
Sometimes, actors also need to have some dialogue placed for them, like if someone has to stand in - I can see this working really well. I was on a production recently that could have used an iPad setup, placed neatly say, behind a vase, with the talent reading off of it.
Of course paper is the best/cheapest medium and sometimes, if the actor isn't on-book, you can just stick the pages in the talent's hands. But you'd have to be careful that the actor isn't going to be self-conscious and trying to compensate for it.
Again - not ideal, but a possiblity.
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/open-dv-discussion/491768-cut-notes-timecode-notes-ipad.html
Saturday, February 19, 2011
Thinking about prompting
Wondering whether, with the availability to corporations of easily produced video and podcasts, whether there's an uptick on private ownership of prompters, and do the talent run it themselves?
Thursday, February 17, 2011
Prompter v Court Reporter
I was thinking about what other skill I could develop that might be a natural outgrowth of prompting. Court reporter? They both require rapid writing and razor-keen listening. I even went out and bought my own steno machine to kind of get a look & feel of the thing...
But then I keep thinking about Dragon Naturally dictate. There are basically two reasons why Dragon doesn't overcome human transcribers: 1) lag time 2) differentiating people in the room. It's not quite "there" yet. So stenographers are still needed in the courtroom.
But really doing legal stuff all day, listening to courtroom procedure, and listening to lawyers talk all day... is that what I want?
What I'm really good at is writing the way people talk. I've listened to probably more newscasts than most people except anchor people, directors and producers of news. (Reporters generally don't listen to/watch the newscast in my experience).
I also write like the wind. So I'm thinking about trying to branch into the "creative" side of corporate speech writing. Believe me, they need me. It's all-too-easy to skate around the edges and not really deliver satisfying words while hitting all the PR points/Brand Messaging. I did prompter at an event the other week and thought about the role of the speech coach, and the writer, and I thought, "why am I behind this prompter?"
Two things that will never go away: prompters, and people's need to express themselves deeply, clearly and creatively, and people that facilitate both.
I can do both. At the same time! And bill for one position! Wonder if anyone will take me up on it?
But then I keep thinking about Dragon Naturally dictate. There are basically two reasons why Dragon doesn't overcome human transcribers: 1) lag time 2) differentiating people in the room. It's not quite "there" yet. So stenographers are still needed in the courtroom.
But really doing legal stuff all day, listening to courtroom procedure, and listening to lawyers talk all day... is that what I want?
What I'm really good at is writing the way people talk. I've listened to probably more newscasts than most people except anchor people, directors and producers of news. (Reporters generally don't listen to/watch the newscast in my experience).
I also write like the wind. So I'm thinking about trying to branch into the "creative" side of corporate speech writing. Believe me, they need me. It's all-too-easy to skate around the edges and not really deliver satisfying words while hitting all the PR points/Brand Messaging. I did prompter at an event the other week and thought about the role of the speech coach, and the writer, and I thought, "why am I behind this prompter?"
Two things that will never go away: prompters, and people's need to express themselves deeply, clearly and creatively, and people that facilitate both.
I can do both. At the same time! And bill for one position! Wonder if anyone will take me up on it?
![]() | ||
| actual steno machine $30 eBay purchase |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)







